︎・Marisa, recentlyEmergency clauseHave you ever heard that?
*Ah, that scary story.DictatorshipI think it's something that might become like that.
︎・That's right! I've heard that story too. But I don't know the details.
＊Leave that to me. The emergency clause allows the Cabinet to enact laws in times of emergency, such as war or disaster, without the approval of the Diet or the courts.
︎・I see. But why is that considered a problem?
*Because there is a possibility that the country could become a dictatorship, where the basic human rights of the people could be threatened under the pretext of a state of emergency.
︎・What kind of things could happen?
*for example,Freezing deposits, confiscating assets, etc. Due to a fiscal deficit, the deposits of all citizens are forcibly frozen and their assets are confiscated.OrCompulsory military serviceThey conscripted adult men and sent them to the battlefield, and used the risk of terrorism as an excuse.Intercepting all communications of citizensOrSuppressing freedom of speechAnd to the governmentIf you resist, you will be arrestedOr...Repeated forced vaccinationsThat's what happens.
︎・Eh, can something like that really happen?
＊That's right. It means that the government could use a state of emergency as an excuse to seize the power of life and death over people.
︎・That's something we can never forgive. We should let the people around us know,Emergency clauseWe have to stop this.
*Yes, share it and let the people around you know.
[See source for full text...]
The following is from X
[Posted by Michiko Iwai]
Please spread the word 🙏 You can easily understand the emergency clause by watching this video. It violates Article 9 of the Peace Constitution and is leading us, the people, into the hell of war. It's a mess. I think the LDP and Komeito are just a group of people who are greedy for privilege. If you are a decent citizen, please do not vote for the LDP or Komeito. pic.twitter.com/Et7V3FyJLx
If the constitution is amended, the Japanese people will suffer hell.
Furthermore, if we go to a national referendum, the constitution will almost certainly be amended, so we must not allow the proposal to amend the constitution. pic.twitter.com/X7JzFHkk51
Demonstrations to dismantle the Ministry of Finance, approval ratings for Ishiba and the LDP. Is this the first time the LDP has been in such a critical situation? I think they'll do something. Major earthquakes, Mount Fuji eruption, North Korean missiles, Taiwan emergency, etc. Even if it doesn't exist, it will only stir up anxiety, allowing them to declare a state of emergency before more damage occurs. pic.twitter.com/WAV7jXw9c5
Emergency clauses enable dictatorship Therefore, we must not give it to a cabinet that does not address the voices of the people or the mismanagement of the current government. But it's hard to understand that Therefore, in addition to stopping the debate on the emergency clause, I would like to encourage criticism that if it is proposed, bad legislation will be passed with the power of money. pic.twitter.com/h6g0n3Bxtg
— Change of Government (@MX2JTSuC278lqKn) March 21, 2025
↓For more detailed information and materials, please see under "Latest Articles."
Materials on "Emergency Situations" – House of Representatives
Materials on "Emergency Situations" – From the House of Representatives
※詳細資料は記事末尾に掲載しております。
「緊急事態」に関する資料 － 衆議院より要約 －
進む“緊急事態条項”の実質運用体制 ～自由と権利が制限される未来とは～
first
The "emergency clause" is currently attracting attention in the discussion of constitutional reform. At first glance, it may not seem like it has been introduced yet, but in fact, Japan's system is already in the process of establishing a legal system that allows the government to take powerful action in emergencies. This document highlights the reality of this.
◆ A system designed to restrict the rights of citizens
In parliamentary responses and other such statements, the premise that "restrictions on fundamental human rights are permissible for the sake of the public welfare" is repeatedly stated. In particular, it is made clear that freedom of expression, property rights, freedom of movement, etc. can be restricted for reasonable reasons in times of emergency. The dangers of censorship of speech and the press have also been pointed out, and the foundations of a free society could be shaken.
◆ Acceptance of state intervention in property and economic activities
The document presented the legal basis for allowing the state to intervene in the economy in times of emergency, including freezing deposits, confiscation of assets, financial controls, debt repayment moratoriums, and supply control. This was justified with the logic that "if it is for a public purpose and with fair compensation, it is permitted," and the plan to strengthen control over economic activity and daily infrastructure is apparent.
◆ Risk of suspension of parliamentary functions and term extension
Assuming that the Diet cannot be convened in an emergency, a system is being discussed that would allow the Cabinet to exercise the same effect as a law at its discretion. In addition, a mechanism is being considered that would allow Diet members' terms to be extended and elections to be postponed due to disasters or emergencies, which could lead to the suspension of the electoral system, which is the foundation of democracy.
◆ Concentration of authority in security agencies and expansion of coercive power
The Police Law provides for a system that allows the National Police Agency to centrally control police forces nationwide by declaring a state of emergency, which will result in the loss of independence for local police forces. The Japan Coast Guard will also be strengthened in its enforcement measures, such as responding to suspicious ships, and cooperation with the Self-Defense Forces is also envisaged in emergencies. A system is being established that will enable more rapid enforcement of public order in the name of maintaining public order.
◆ Emergency provisions have been effectively enacted through legal arrangements
The document repeatedly stated the view that "there is sufficient legislation to deal with this without amending the Constitution." In other words, the system already has the same content as an emergency clause, and it can be activated immediately depending on the operational decision.
in conclusion
Many people may think, "I'm relieved because the emergency clause hasn't been introduced yet." However, as you can see from this document, the system is already prepared for it. In order to protect freedom and rights, each and every one of us needs to pay close attention to these developments and deepen our understanding.
JapanNewsNavi Editorial Department B
Below are documents on "emergency situations" from the House of Representatives:
The contents of this bill are a perfect example of moving towards communism. It is certainly dictatorial. We must not compromise on this! This bill clearly states that the government is a traitor. The Ministry of Finance, immigration, everything is connected. Japan-China friendship? How is that friendship? Don't be fooled by word manipulation. This clause makes the hypothesis that the Chinese Communist Party will omit the terms no longer a hypothesis.
This government does all sorts of strange things. I'm totally against it.
This is something I really want you to see, it's extremely dangerous. If this passes, it will be the end of Japan, and we will become a dictatorship... We must not let that happen. They are torturing the people, and trying to kill them. It's horrifying. Absolutely not!
If a constitutional amendment is proposed, even if there is a national referendum, it will pass 100% through organized votes. The UN enemy country clause has not been removed, so if a constitutional amendment that specifies the creation of a national defense force is proposed, it will automatically lead to war. The emergency clause will turn Japan into a dictatorship, and the country will no longer be able to stop its rampage.
I understand that emergency clauses are in place to prepare for emergencies such as disasters and wars. There may even be conscription. But with the current government, which seems to be full of puppet politicians, naturalized citizens, and spies from enemy countries, there is a risk that the clauses will be abused. In the first place, there has been no reflection on the mismanagement of nearly 30 years, and the restoration of Noto has not been done properly.
This was far more dangerous than I imagined... If this were to be enacted, it wouldn't just be a matter of making life harder for Japanese people. I hope that even people who are indifferent to politics will realize how dangerous the emergency clause is.
The decision to start a war is almost always made without any direct input from the people! The government and leaders have the power to decide when to start a war, the people's opinions are not heard in an emergency, public opinion is manipulated, and people cannot oppose it. Conscription is the law. Scary! lol
Let's go vote and vote for anyone other than the LDP.
From Ishiba's perspective, he wants to insert an emergency clause at all costs to realize and justify his theory that "demonstrations are acts of terrorism, and those who do not go to war will be sentenced to death or imprisonment for 300 years." In addition, "creating an independent constitution that eliminates national sovereignty, pacifism, and basic human rights" has been a long-cherished wish of the LDP since its founding.
I saw it because it was trending, but is it true that this will pass the Constitutional Review Committee on March 3th?
Japan, which has no anti-espionage law and is very lenient on immigrants, cannot have an emergency clause! If the anti-espionage law is implemented and measures are not taken against immigrants, including Chinese, Koreans, North Koreans, and Kurds, Japan will be taken over. The emergency clause must be enacted after the above provisions are established.
But seriously, how can the government arbitrarily decide on emergency clauses that allow it to treat the people like garbage? Where are the basic human rights?
After my night shift, something ridiculous was trending, so I looked it up and found out that they're trying to pass it through the Diet. Don't try to pass something crazy behind the scenes of SNS regulations and gift certificate issues.
It's a problem we can't afford to be unaware of. It's too scary.
For now, I will demonstrate on social media. To prevent further destruction of the society in which the children of my relatives and acquaintances can grow up healthy.
There are times when the enemy side will not go along with the planned order due to the emergency clause, but what kind of times are they when natural disasters occur one after another? It is often said that they will take advantage of this to attack, but the enemy's minions do not have strong wills. Such people rarely come to areas where natural disasters occur.
The emergency clauses are: 1. Freezing of deposits and confiscation of property, 2. Compulsory and forced military service, 3. Suppression of freedom of speech, 4. Forced restriction of movement, 5. Loss of secrecy of communications, 6. Removal of the right to know, 7. Forced suspension of business activities, 8. Forced vaccination. Things are finally heading in a dangerous direction.
This clause is a means that is not actually related to the emergency. The goal is a totally controlled society under the WEF agenda (you own nothing). Global communism. The UN Agenda 2030 helps achieve this. The US thwarted this plot with the election of Trump, but Europe and Japan are forging ahead with it.
What are the dangers lurking in the emergency clause?
Recently, the term "emergency clause" has become more common on social media. This topic has been spreading and attracting attention, especially among the younger generation, through videos that explain the meaning in a relaxed manner. I actually watched one of these videos, and found it easier to understand than I had imagined, but at the same time, I felt a strong sense of discomfort and crisis.
The emergency clause is said to be a system that allows the government to exercise special powers without the approval of the Diet or the courts when the nation faces a state of emergency such as war, major disaster, or pandemic. Specifically, it allows the Cabinet to issue orders with the same force as laws, which could temporarily suspend the principle of separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
Some people may think that this is merely "a part of the measures to prepare for emergencies." However, the problem is that the definition of "emergency" is vague and it could be applied arbitrarily. In fact, looking back at history, there are many cases around the world where countries have used "emergency situations" as an excuse to restrict the rights of their citizens and strengthen dictatorial regimes.
Potential serious incidents and their impact on the public
As was mentioned in the video, if this emergency clause were introduced, it would create a situation in which it would be possible to "legally" freeze people's bank accounts, confiscate their assets, wiretap their communications, censor speech, force them to get vaccinated, and even make military service compulsory. Of course, this may not necessarily happen immediately, but the biggest problem is that it opens up such possibilities as a system.
The "freedom" and "human rights" that we take for granted every day are by no means absolute. More people need to be aware that they can easily be shaken depending on the political system. If we do not try to protect our freedom, we will lose it. And once freedom is lost, it is much more difficult than you might imagine to regain it.
If a "state of emergency" were to be declared at the government's discretion, resulting in restrictions on the press and censoring online speech, Japan could no longer be called a democratic nation. When that happens, even if people want to speak out against something, they will be deprived of the means to do so.
What we need to think about now
I do not think of this issue as simply a constitutional debate. This is a serious topic that directly affects the lives and future of each and every one of us. It could affect everything, including the economy, medical care, education, and home safety. That is why I feel that the public should take this debate more seriously.
I think it's a good trend that information is being spread to the younger generation in an easy-to-understand format like a leisurely explanation. However, rather than letting it end as just an online topic, how we deal with real politics and how we express our opinions will determine the direction of Japan's future.
Rather than supporting or opposing a particular political party, it is important for the people to draw a clear line. How do we protect a system that prevents power from running wild even in times of emergency? That is where the true value of democracy lies. If that is lost, we will have entered an irreversible society.
That is why I believe we should be cautious about introducing emergency clauses, and at the same time, I want more people to understand how much it means to the people.
Comment